Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Tackling the Gender Super Gap) Bill 2025; Second Reading

Senate · Thursday 4 September 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate focused on a bill allowing spouses to voluntarily split their superannuation balances to address the gender super gap. Senator Jane Hume argued that the measure recognises unpaid caregiving contributions and provides a voluntary mechanism for couples to equalise retirement savings. She outlined specific integrity safeguards, including tax neutrality and limits on transfer amounts, to protect the superannuation system. The debate was adjourned with leave granted for the senator to continue her remarks later.

Outcome

Debate adjourned with leave granted for the senator to continue remarks later.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Jane Hume (VIC) (Liberal Party) Liberal

Senator Hume supported the bill, arguing it addresses structural inequalities that leave women with significantly lower superannuation balances due to career interruptions for caregiving. Hume described the measure as a voluntary tool for couples to share retirement savings, reflecting the economic partnership within families. The senator emphasised that the proposal does not force transfers but offers an option to balance funds during the accumulation phase. Hume contended that this approach is fairer than existing contribution mechanisms, which have low uptake due to complexity.