Opened the debate
Askew supported the bill as a measure to ensure responsible spending of tax dollars and proper parliamentary oversight. Askew argued that material changes to the Housing Australia Investment Mandate, particularly regarding the Home Guarantee Scheme, should be subject to disallowance rather than being made via simple instruments. Askew contended that the government had expanded the scheme without income or placement caps, which required scrutiny by elected officials. Askew maintained that the bill would restore accountability and prevent the executive from bypassing parliamentary scrutiny through delegated legislation.