Answers to Questions

Ciccone defended the government's biosecurity system, stating it was repaired after being underfunded by the previous administration. Ciccone noted that US beef imports had been permitted since 2019 and that the current decision followed a rigorous, science-based assessment lasting nearly a decade. Ciccone argued that industry bodies supported the process and that Australian beef remained competitive due to strong domestic supply.

Kovacic criticised the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union for expanding into New South Wales while in administration, arguing this would increase construction costs during a housing crisis. Kovacic cited estimates that union involvement could raise unit prices by 30 per cent, potentially adding hundreds of thousands of dollars to property costs. Kovacic accused the government of failing to hold the union accountable for corruption and intimidation.

Dolega characterised the Coalition's comments as attacks on working people and unions, which he said had created safer workplaces. Dolega defended the government's housing agenda, including shared equity schemes, and argued that wages were not driving up housing costs. Dolega also affirmed that biosecurity laws would not be compromised, noting his family background in beef farming.

Hume questioned the motive behind lifting biosecurity restrictions, suggesting it may have been a concession to secure relief from US tariffs. Hume argued that an independent review was necessary to ensure there was no risk to the beef industry, noting that even a small probability of biosecurity failure was unacceptable. Hume challenged the government to clarify what concessions were made in exchange for the policy change.