Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

We All Come Together For Country Bill 2025; Second Reading

Senate · Wednesday 26 March 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned the introduction of legislation to penalise industrial emissions that damage First Nations rock art sites recognised as national heritage. The Greens senator argued that current laws fail to protect these sites from corrosive pollutants and that the bill would address this gap by establishing vulnerability investigations and civil penalties. The speech highlighted the destruction of rock art at Murujuga due to gas and fertiliser industry activities, citing scientific evidence of acid damage. The senator contended that protecting heritage supports sustainable tourism and preserves cultural history for future generations.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned with leave granted for the senator to continue remarks later.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Cox moved the second reading of the bill, which seeks to legislate penalties for emissions damaging significant First Nations rock art. Cox argued that rock art is an irreplaceable cultural resource dating back tens of thousands of years, with over 100,000 sites across Australia. Cox stated that the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 currently contains a policy gap, as it does not treat emissions damaging heritage monuments as a matter of national environmental significance. Cox proposed that the bill would insert a new controlled action into the Act, requiring vulnerability investigations for monuments at risk from industrial activity. Cox argued that if damage is confirmed, the minister must declare a prohibited area and impose civil financial penalties on entities continuing to pollute.