Question Time AU

Take Note Debate

Environment

Senate · Wednesday 26 March 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senator Larissa Waters moved that the Senate take note of the Minister's answer regarding environment laws. She argued that the government had failed to deliver on election promises to reform the EPBC Act, citing political interference from state leaders and corporate interests. Waters criticised a proposed legislative change that would prevent ministers from reconsidering decisions based on new scientific evidence, arguing this threatened the maugean skate. She characterised the move as prioritising a small number of jobs in the salmon industry over biodiversity protection. The motion was agreed to by the Senate.

Outcome

The motion was agreed to.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Waters argued that both major parties failed to strengthen environmental laws due to influence from mining and logging industries. Waters stated that the Prime Minister cancelled a proposed reform after consulting with the Western Australian Premier, prioritising political considerations over nature protection. Waters claimed the government was instead pursuing a deal with the opposition to weaken laws, specifically to allow the Tasmanian salmon industry to continue operating despite threats to the maugean skate. Waters argued that the proposed legislation would prevent ministers from acting on new scientific information, effectively creating a loophole for industries to bypass environmental protections. Waters concluded that this approach demonstrated corporate dominance over democratic processes and pledged to push for stronger nature protection in future governments.