Without Notice

General Debate

Melbourne Electorate: Community Events, Artificial Intelligence

House of Representatives · Tuesday 13 October 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Sarah Witty highlighted the vibrancy of Melbourne's creative industries, citing specific organisations such as the Melbourne Fringe Festival, St Martins Youth Arts Centre, and the Social Studio. She noted the economic contribution of the cultural sector and the government's financial support for live music venues through the Revive Live program. Witty argued that unregulated AI training poses a threat to artists' intellectual property rights. She stated that the government opposes broad text and data mining exceptions and is consulting on copyright reforms to protect creators.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Sarah Witty (Melbourne) (Australian Labor Party) ALP

Witty described Melbourne as a hub for live music, theatre, and gaming, emphasising the role of small venues and community organisations in nurturing talent. Witty cited the Melbourne Fringe Festival and St Martins Youth Arts Centre as examples of the city's creative depth. Witty highlighted the economic growth in digital games development and the broader cultural economy. Witty detailed government funding for live music venues through Revive Live and the establishment of Music Australia. Witty argued that generative AI threatens artists' copyright and moral rights, stating the government has ruled out broad text and data mining exceptions to protect intellectual property.

Get updates like this by email