Without Notice

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Sex Discrimination and Fair Work Amendment (Equality in Treatment in Religious Schools) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 12 October 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned a private member's bill introduced by Allegra Spender to remove exemptions in federal law permitting religious schools to discriminate against students and staff based on sex, sexuality, gender identity, relationship status, or pregnancy. Spender argued the legislation balances faith and fairness by allowing faith-based hiring for specific roles while prohibiting discrimination in other areas, citing personal stories of affected individuals. Kate Chaney seconded the motion, highlighting that both major parties had previously committed to such reforms and noting that several states had already implemented similar protections. The debate concluded with the motion being seconded, with no further speakers or outcome details provided in the transcript.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Allegra Spender (Wentworth) (Independent) Ind

Spender moved the second reading of the bill, arguing that current federal law permits religious schools to dismiss teachers or expel students for being gay, transgender, divorced, or pregnant. Spender cited specific cases of individuals who faced professional or educational consequences due to these exemptions, including an ordained minister fired after engagement and a student threatened with expulsion. The proposed legislation repeals section 38 of the Sex Discrimination Act, removing exemptions for students entirely and limiting staff exemptions to initial hiring and senior leadership roles based on faith. Spender emphasised that the bill aligns with recommendations from the Australian Law Reform Commission and fulfils previous government commitments to protect LGBTQIA+ Australians while preserving the ability of religious institutions to maintain their ethos.

Get updates like this by email