Continued the debate
Leeser argued that the Coalition supported strong laws to protect sport integrity but had concerns about the bill's drafting. Leeser noted that the legislation creates serious Commonwealth criminal offences, including imprisonment of up to 10 years and substantial fines, which require clear and proportionate definitions. Leeser criticised the departure from the Wood review recommendations, particularly the removal of the wagering nexus, which broadens the scope beyond betting-related corruption. Leeser warned that the broad definition of sporting bodies could inadvertently capture community clubs, volunteers, and junior competitions, potentially criminalising ordinary sporting decisions or honest mistakes. Leeser raised concerns about ministerial declaration powers, noting they are not subject to parliamentary disallowance and lack statutory criteria or consultation requirements. Leeser also pointed out that the bill does not complete the broader reform agenda, such as the Australian Sports Wagering Scheme or a protected disclosure framework. Leeser questioned the enforcement capacity, noting funding for the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions but no corresponding funding for the Australian Federal Police or Sport Integrity Australia. Leeser concluded that the Coalition would use the Senate committee process to scrutinise these issues before finalising its position.