Question Time AU

General Debate

Vanuatu-Australia Nakamal Agreement

House of Representatives · Monday 7 September 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Members debated a motion acknowledging the significance of the recently signed Australia-Vanuatu Nakamal Agreement. Speakers highlighted the agreement's focus on economic development, climate resilience, and regional security, while noting Vanuatu's commitment to keeping its territory free from foreign military bases. One independent member welcomed the partnership but criticised Australia's continued fossil fuel exports as inconsistent with Pacific climate priorities. The debate concluded with broad support for the agreement as a means to strengthen bilateral ties and regional stability.

Outcome

The motion was agreed to.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Clutterham moved the motion to acknowledge the Nakamal Agreement, describing it as a strategic partnership based on mutual respect and trust. Clutterham outlined four key drivers: deepening integration, supporting Vanuatu's economic transformation, enhancing climate resilience, and protecting collective security. Clutterham noted that the agreement includes support for Vanuatu's digital economy, cyberliteracy, and workforce training through Australian qualifications. Clutterham emphasised Vanuatu's commitment to policing cooperation and its pledge to prevent foreign military bases on its territory. Clutterham argued that these measures contribute to broader Indo-Pacific stability and prosperity.