Question Time AU

General Debate

Housing

House of Representatives · Monday 7 September 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion moved by the Opposition condemning the Government's housing record and outlining Coalition alternatives. Government members defended their $47 billion housing agenda, citing increased building approvals and infrastructure investment, while arguing the Opposition had previously neglected housing. Opposition members attributed the crisis to high migration levels, regulatory red tape, and tax changes, proposing a $5 billion infrastructure fund and code reductions. The discussion highlighted divergent views on the causes of the shortage and the effectiveness of current supply-side measures.

Outcome

The motion was debated but the transcript does not state the final voting result.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Caldwell moved a motion condemning the Government for increasing the housing shortfall to 400,000 persons and reducing annual home building to 170,000. Caldwell argued that rents had risen by 22 per cent and that the Government was failing to meet its target of 1.2 million homes. The motion highlighted the Opposition's plan to cut the National Construction Code, overhaul skilled migration, and establish a $5 billion Housing Infrastructure Fund. Caldwell criticised the Government's reliance on symbolic gestures rather than practical delivery, citing delays in Victoria's transitional housing projects.