General Debate

Economy

House of Representatives · Monday 7 September 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion moved by the Opposition calling for responsible budget management, debt reduction, and a cap on government spending growth. The Opposition argued that high debt and inflation were harming households and proposed measures including a tax-to-GDP cap and a Future Generations Fund. Government members defended their fiscal record, citing tax cuts, savings, and a AAA credit rating, while warning that Opposition spending limits would lead to service cuts. The discussion highlighted contrasting views on how to address cost-of-living pressures and manage national debt.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Ben Small (Forrest) (Liberal Party) Liberal

Small moved the motion, arguing that the government had accumulated $1 trillion in debt, resulting in interest costs of $50,000 per minute. Small claimed that uncontrolled spending was driving inflation and reducing living standards for everyday Australians. The Opposition proposed placing a speed limit on government spending to ensure it did not outpace economic growth. Small also outlined plans to restore a tax-to-GDP cap, end corporate welfare programs such as the National Reconstruction Fund, and establish a Future Generations Fund to invest in infrastructure.

Claire Clutterham (Sturt) (Australian Labor Party) ALP oppose

Clutterham defended the government's economic agenda, highlighting tax cuts such as the $1,000 instant write-off and the working Australians tax offset. Clutterham argued that the government had found $64 billion in savings and maintained a AAA sovereign credit rating, indicating sound fiscal management. Clutterham stated that debt was lower than the inherited trajectory and emphasised the importance of regional security in protecting Australia's future.
Simon Kennedy (Cook) (Liberal Party) Liberal support

Kennedy argued that households and small businesses were struggling with rising costs, citing examples of business closures and increased energy bills in the electorate of Cook. Kennedy claimed that income tax as a percentage of GDP was at a record high and that the government's spending was unsustainable. Kennedy promoted the Opposition's tax back guarantee, which would index tax thresholds to inflation to prevent bracket creep and provide annual tax relief for income earners.
Julie-Ann Campbell (Moreton) (Australian Labor Party) ALP oppose

Campbell contended that the Opposition's call for spending limits was a pretext for cutting essential services such as health care and education. Campbell argued that the government's budget exceeded the mid-year update by $45 billion and that debt levels were decreasing relative to the inherited trajectory. Campbell stated that the government had cut taxes five times and supported housing and business initiatives, contrasting this with the Opposition's history of voting down tax cuts.

Opened by

Ben Small (Forrest) (Liberal Party)

Liberal

Speeches

4 speeches, 3 other contributors

Topics

Budget & Economy Cost of Living Tax

Debate Cost of Living Matter of Public Importance, 14 Sep 2026 · Shared topics: Budget & Economy, Cost of Living
Debate Albanese Government Matter of Public Importance, 16 Sep 2026 · Shared topics: Budget & Economy, Cost of Living
Question Time House Question Time 13 Aug 2026 · Shared topics: Budget & Economy, Cost of Living
Question Time House Question Time 18 Aug 2026 · Shared topics: Budget & Economy, Cost of Living

About House of Representatives debates

The House of Representatives debates bills, motions and matters of public importance in its main chamber. Members from all parties can take part, and the responsible minister usually replies for the government. Summaries are in reported speech, not transcripts; always check the official record before quoting.