Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 17 August 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate focused on the principles of the Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2026, which aims to ensure equal medical care for children born alive after attempted terminations. Llew O'Brien argued that current clinical guidelines in some jurisdictions allow for the withholding of life-sustaining treatment from these infants, citing international obligations and coronial findings. The bill proposes statutory duties for medical care, reporting requirements for such births, and protections for mothers. No other members spoke during this segment of the debate.

Outcome

The bill was moved for second reading by Llew O'Brien.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

O'Brien supported the bill, arguing it fulfills Australia's obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child by protecting the right to life and health for all children. O'Brien cited data indicating that hundreds of babies are born alive following late-term abortions annually, with survival rates varying significantly. O'Brien highlighted that in some jurisdictions, clinical guidelines permit withholding life-sustaining treatment from these infants, unlike in New South Wales and South Australia where statutory duties exist. O'Brien referenced the 1998 death of baby Jessica Jane in the Northern Territory to illustrate the risks of inadequate protocols. O'Brien stated the bill establishes that every child born alive deserves equal care, whether that involves emergency treatment or palliative care, and introduces reporting mechanisms while protecting mothers from prosecution.