Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Health Insurance Amendment (Incentive Payments and Other Measures) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Wednesday 1 July 2026

Continued from Monday 29 June 2026.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on the legislative framework for Commonwealth health incentive payments and the state of Medicare under the current government. Coalition members supported the bill's intent to provide statutory footing for incentive programs but opposed the government's record on bulk-billing, citing rising out-of-pocket costs and regional access issues. Labor members defended the bill as essential for strengthening Medicare, highlighting increased bulk-billing rates and investments in primary care. The coalition moved a second reading amendment to refer the bill to the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee for scrutiny.

Outcome

The coalition moved a second reading amendment to refer the bill to the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

McCormack stated that the coalition supports the bill's purpose of establishing a legislative framework for health incentive payments but believes it requires further scrutiny by the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee. McCormack argued that bulk-billing rates in regional Australia have declined significantly since the coalition left office, contrasting current statistics with previous government figures. McCormack criticised the government's changes to distribution priority areas, claiming they reduced medical services in remote communities, and raised concerns about NDIS funding changes affecting vulnerable families. McCormack also argued that changes to private health rebates for older Australians would shift costs to the public health system.

Opposition response

Wallace stated that the coalition would not oppose the bill in the House but moved a second reading amendment to refer it to the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee for proper scrutiny. Wallace argued that the government had failed to keep its promise that Australians only needed their Medicare card, citing record-high out-of-pocket costs and a collapse in bulk-billing rates. Wallace claimed that the government was intimidating general practices with threatening letters to force bulk-billing and argued that the system was shifting towards corporate, high-volume clinics at the expense of independent family doctors. Wallace highlighted that GP consultations had fallen by 1.8 million compared to the previous year.