Question Time AU

General Debate

Health Care

House of Representatives · Monday 29 June 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion moved by Luke Gosling commending the government's delivery of 137 Medicare Urgent Care Clinics and its $8.5 billion investment in Medicare. Labor members argued the clinics reduced pressure on emergency departments, provided free after-hours care, and improved bulk-billing rates. Coalition and National Party members criticised the geographic distribution of clinics as favouring urban Labor seats, argued the clinics failed to address primary care shortages in regional areas, and highlighted systemic issues with Medicare payments for rural doctors. The motion was supported by Labor members and opposed by Coalition and National Party members.

Outcome

The motion was agreed to without division.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Gosling moved the motion to welcome the opening of 137 Medicare Urgent Care Clinics and note the 3.2 million presentations they had received. Gosling argued the clinics reduced pressure on hospital emergency departments, citing data from the Northern Territory where combined activity in Darwin and Palmerston doubled after the new clinic opened. Gosling highlighted that the Northern Territory achieved an 89.7 per cent bulk-billing rate, the highest in the country, attributing this to the government's $8.5 billion investment in Medicare. Gosling stated the clinics provided essential bulk-billed care without appointments, particularly benefiting constituents who would otherwise visit emergency departments for non-life-threatening issues.

Opposition response

Webster argued that urgent care clinics were a metropolitan-focused solution that ignored the needs of regional Australia, where 66 per cent of clinics were located in Labor electorates. Webster contended that primary care was a more cost-effective way to prevent emergency department visits, noting the lower cost of a general practice consultation compared to an urgent care clinic visit. Webster criticised the government for failing to adequately fund primary care in regional areas and for reducing patient travel reimbursements in Victoria. Webster described the clinics as band-aids that did not address underlying issues such as chronic disease management and workforce shortages in rural communities.