Question Time AU

General Debate

Aged Care

House of Representatives · Monday 29 June 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a private member's motion moved by the National Party, which argued that the Government was failing older Australians through bureaucratic delays and a flawed assessment algorithm. Opposition members cited constituent stories of denied care and excessive wait times, while also highlighting concerns about the removal of assessor discretion. Government members defended the reforms, citing reduced wait times, increased funding, and the scale of demographic demand, while attributing systemic issues to previous Coalition policies. The motion was ultimately condemned by the Government.

Outcome

The motion was condemned by the Government.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Conaghan moved the motion, arguing that the transition to the Support at Home program had resulted in systematic failures for vulnerable older Australians. Conaghan claimed the Integrated Assessment Tool algorithm was unfit for use, producing questionable outcomes and lacking capacity for human override, which led to disputes and delays. Conaghan highlighted that over 200,000 older Australians faced unmet care needs due to long wait times and inadequate funding in the 2026-27 budget. Conaghan also noted that interim funding arrangements left recipients on partial support for months, and warned that removing regional loadings could reduce provider viability in rural areas. Conaghan called for increased packages, reduced waiting times, and the implementation of clinical oversight mechanisms.