Opened the debate
Spender moved amendments to omit Part 9 of the bill, arguing it granted the minister sweeping powers over an $830 billion budget without statutory limits or parliamentary oversight. Spender contended that linking grants and procurement to industrial instruments could disadvantage small businesses that rely on awards rather than enterprise agreements. Spender cited evidence that similar policies in Queensland reduced construction productivity by nine per cent and referenced the Watson report regarding corruption costs in Victoria. Spender maintained that while supporting enterprise bargaining, the current bill lacked necessary safeguards and risked limiting value for money.