Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Treasury Laws Amendment (Fuel Excise Relief No. 2) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 22 June 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Treasurer introduced legislation to extend fuel excise relief for one month, reducing petrol and diesel prices by 16 cents per litre from 1 July to 2 August. This measure aims to provide continued cost-of-living assistance while tapering support as global fuel markets stabilise following geopolitical tensions. The bill also includes a reduction in the heavy vehicle road user charge and is supported by state and territory contributions. The debate concluded with the adjournment of discussion, with no opposition speeches recorded in the transcript.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Chalmers argued that the bill provides necessary, temporary relief to motorists and small businesses facing ongoing cost-of-living pressures. Chalmers stated that the extension reduces fuel costs by 16 cents per litre, saving drivers approximately $11 per tank, and aligns with the scheduled indexation date. The Treasurer emphasised that this support is tapered and responsible, acknowledging that while global prices have moderated, domestic pressures remain. Chalmers highlighted that the measure is part of a broader strategy including tax cuts and fuel security initiatives.

Government response

Chalmers detailed the government's comprehensive approach to fuel security, citing the establishment of a $712 billion Fuel and Fertiliser Security Facility and the securing of significant diesel and jet fuel stocks. Chalmers noted that states and territories agreed to contribute to the discount following National Cabinet discussions. The Treasurer linked the fuel relief to other economic measures, including income tax cuts and minimum wage increases, arguing these actions collectively address cost-of-living challenges. Chalmers commended the bill as a responsive measure to global uncertainty and domestic economic needs.