Active Transport Fund

Ryan welcomed the funding commitment but called for expanded eligibility parameters for the fund. Ryan argued that the current requirement for pathways to be adjacent to road assets excluded valuable off-road greenways, such as the Box Hill to Hawthorn trail. Ryan urged the government to open the guideline revision process to public submission. Ryan also contrasted the active transport investment with billions in diesel subsidies for the mining sector, questioning the government's priorities regarding decarbonisation.

Phillips seconded the motion, noting the importance of shared pathways in her coastal electorate. Phillips highlighted community-led projects in Bawley Point and Kioloa, as well as the shelved Jamberoo cycleway. Phillips argued that safe pathways are essential for an ageing population and for encouraging physical activity among families. Phillips stated that the funding helps councils deliver infrastructure that connects schools, shops, and public transport hubs, supporting both public health and the local tourism economy.

Venning criticised the motion, arguing that the fund was inappropriate for his vast rural electorate where car travel is essential. Venning claimed that regional road infrastructure in South Australia was crumbling and underfunded, citing specific examples of potholes and road failures. Venning argued that the government had cut road funding and shifted the federal-state funding split, leaving councils to manage deteriorating networks. Venning contended that resources should be directed to fixing main roads rather than building bike paths.

Roberts commended the government for the long-term certainty provided by the ten-year funding commitment. Roberts argued that the fund addresses safety gaps in growing suburban areas like Pearce, where missing footpaths and unsafe crossings are common. Roberts highlighted the role of local councils in identifying infrastructure needs and delivering projects that improve community wellbeing. Roberts stated that the fund supports broader objectives of reducing emissions and easing congestion while making communities more liveable.

Wallace argued that road safety outcomes were worsening under the government, with rising fatalities in Queensland. Wallace claimed the government had cancelled or delayed billions in transport infrastructure projects, including specific upgrades on the Sunshine Coast. Wallace stated that motorists were paying more in fuel excise while receiving less investment in road maintenance. Wallace asserted that the state government had to compensate for federal cuts and criticised the government for focusing on announcements rather than delivering results.

Gosling supported the motion, emphasising the government's commitment to road safety and connected communities in the Northern Territory. Gosling noted the total investment of $600 million in active transport and encouraged local councils in Darwin and Palmerston to apply for the next funding round. Gosling argued that the fund helps separate vulnerable road users from traffic and supports broader goals of reducing emissions and congestion. Gosling also referenced broader infrastructure investments aimed at improving productivity and resilience.