Continued the debate
Kennedy argued that the budget represented an assault on aspiration, unfairly taxing younger Australians and retirees who had saved and invested responsibly. Kennedy cited constituent stories to illustrate the negative impact of doubling capital gains tax and removing negative gearing benefits, claiming these measures would reduce housing supply by 35,000 homes. Kennedy contended that the government was breaking election promises and using tax hikes to fund record spending, creating intergenerational unfairness. Kennedy characterised the reforms as punitive towards hard work and investment, asserting that the government lacked integrity for not seeking a mandate for these changes at the election.