Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Public and Educational Lending Rights (Better Income for Authors) Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Wednesday 1 April 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned the consequential amendments required to transition from the Public Lending Right Act 1985 to a new unified lending rights framework. Tony Burke moved the second reading, arguing the bill ensures legislative continuity and extends oversight to the Educational Lending Right scheme. No other members spoke, and the debate was adjourned without a recorded vote in the transcript.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Burke argued that the bill repeals the Public Lending Right Act 1985 to facilitate the transition to a unified lending rights framework. Burke stated that the legislation ensures related laws operate consistently and provides certainty for claimants during the transition. Burke noted that the existing committee would continue to oversee both the Public and Educational Lending Right schemes. Burke concluded that these measures strengthen support for Australian creators and maintain a stable system.

Government response

Burke moved the second reading of the bill, explaining that it repeals the Public Lending Right Act 1985 to support the new unified framework. Burke emphasised that the amendments ensure legislative continuity and extend the oversight committee's role to include the Educational Lending Right scheme. Burke argued that the bill provides certainty for claimants and strengthens support for creators. Burke commended the bill to the House as a measure to keep the lending rights system fit for purpose.