Question Time AU

General Debate

Trade with the European Union

House of Representatives · Monday 30 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The House debated a motion moved by the Australian Labor Party to recognise the conclusion of negotiations for a free trade agreement with the European Union. Labor members argued the deal delivers significant economic benefits, diversifies trade, and opens access to a $30 trillion economy, while Coalition members contended it fails to secure meaningful market access for key agricultural sectors and concedes too much on issues like geographical indications and fossil fuel subsidies. The debate highlighted sharp divisions over the adequacy of quotas for beef, sheepmeat, and sugar, with industry groups cited by both sides to support their respective positions. The motion was supported by Labor MPs who emphasised the strategic and economic value of the partnership, whereas Liberal and National Party members criticised the agreement as a missed opportunity that disadvantages Australian producers.

Outcome

The motion was agreed to without division.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Repacholi moved the motion, arguing that the agreement is a landmark deal that opens access to the EU's $30 trillion market and 450 million customers. Repacholi stated that the deal eliminates tariffs on almost all Australian exports, benefiting sectors such as wine, dairy, grains, and horticulture in his electorate and across Australia. Repacholi highlighted that the agreement supports the energy transition by removing tariffs on critical minerals and hydrogen, while also lowering costs for consumers through cheaper imports. Repacholi emphasised that the deal strengthens Australia's partnerships in a turbulent global trade environment and creates well-paid jobs through increased investment and export opportunities.

Opposition response

Pasin argued that the agreement falls short for Australian producers, citing criticism from the National Farmers' Federation and other industry groups who described the outcome as disappointing. Pasin contended that tariffs were not the primary barrier, as quotas and protectionist measures remain, limiting meaningful market access. Pasin expressed concern that the agreement includes undertakings to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, which he linked to diesel fuel rebates for farmers, potentially threatening their viability. Pasin characterised the deal as a symbolic win that fails to deliver the economic outcomes required by regional communities.