Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 30 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centered on the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026, which sought to empower Export Finance Australia to secure fuel imports amid a geopolitical crisis. Coalition members supported the bill as a necessary short-term measure but criticized the government's delayed response and restrictions on domestic fossil fuel production, while independent members raised concerns about fiscal risks and market distortions. Kate Chaney supported the crisis response but demanded transparency, whereas Rebekha Sharkie and Andrew Wallace opposed the government's handling of fuel security despite Wallace welcoming the bill itself. Two amendments moved by Alison Penfold and Barnaby Joyce were defeated, and the bill ultimately failed both divisions.

Outcome

The bill was not passed in both divisions, with votes of 43 to 91 and 38 to 96.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Landry stated that the coalition would support the bill because securing fuel supply was critical during the crisis. Landry argued that regional communities were disproportionately affected by rising costs and supply shortages. Landry emphasised that restoring fuel security required more than just imports, calling for immediate cost-of-living relief and support for Australian production. Landry urged the government to act with urgency to protect living standards and support small businesses.

Opposition response

Webster congratulated the government for adopting coalition recommendations to halve the fuel excise and remove heavy vehicle road user charges, though she noted the delay in action. Webster highlighted the severe impact on regional industries, including job losses in earth-moving and risks to citrus harvests due to high fuel costs. Webster argued that the bill was a reactive measure that failed to address Australia's vast domestic energy resources, such as oil, gas, and biofuels. Webster criticised the government's previous restrictions on fossil fuel investment and called for a dedicated fuel security budget and investment in domestic exploration.

Votes during this debate

Division 1: Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026; Second Reading Not passed 43–91 Division 2: Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026; Second Reading Not passed 38–96