High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026; Second Reading

Opened the debate

Wilson moved the second reading of the bill, stating it enables Australia to ratify the high seas biodiversity treaty that entered into force in January 2026. Wilson explained that the legislation creates a regulatory regime for marine genetic resources, genetic data, spatial management instruments, and ecological effect evaluations. Wilson noted that the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties had recommended ratification in 2024. Wilson emphasised that the bill complements Australia's existing marine park network, which currently protects more than 52 per cent of the nation's maritime jurisdiction. Wilson argued that ratifying the treaty demonstrates commitment to international law and supports the worldwide goal of conserving 30 per cent of ocean zones by 2030.

Opposition response

Bell stated that the coalition supports the bill as necessary legislation to implement the treaty negotiated under the previous government. Bell criticised the current government for delaying ratification for two years, noting that approximately 85 countries had already ratified the agreement. Bell argued that the new regulatory frameworks must be practical and efficient, avoiding duplication of existing international and regional ocean governance mechanisms. Bell questioned the government's plan to achieve the 30 per cent marine protection target by 2030, citing a lack of credible detail and timelines. Bell pledged to scrutinise the implementation of the treaty to ensure it does not diminish Australia's record of ocean stewardship.