Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Tuesday 31 March 2026

Continued from Monday 30 March 2026.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026, which facilitates Australia's ratification of the United Nations agreement on marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction. The government and independent members supported the bill as essential for international leadership, ocean health, and aligning domestic law with global standards. The opposition supported the treaty in principle but raised concerns about potential over-regulation of the domestic fishing industry and the need for genuine partnership with regional communities. The bill was passed after the second reading.

Outcome

The bill was read a second time.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

Gorman argued that the bill enables Australia to ratify the high seas biodiversity treaty, which was adopted by the United Nations in June 2023. Gorman stated that ratification allows Australia to participate in international decision-making and supports the ocean economy by creating a clear regulatory framework. Gorman noted that the treaty complements existing marine parks, which protect 52 per cent of Australia's maritime jurisdiction, and helps address the fact that only one per cent of the global ocean beyond national jurisdiction is currently protected. Gorman emphasised that the bill strengthens regional relationships and supports the rules-based multilateral system.

Opposition response

Venning expressed support for sustainable oceans but criticised the government for sidelining fishing communities in policy decisions. Venning argued that the domestic seafood industry is already strictly regulated and sustainable, and warned that additional red tape could push operators out of global markets. Venning highlighted economic pressures on regional towns like Port Lincoln, including high fuel costs and algal blooms, and called for practical support such as Doppler radar rather than further regulation. Venning demanded that no additional fishing grounds be closed without independent food security assessments and genuine consultation with the industry.