Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (2026 Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Wednesday 25 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate focused on the second reading of an omnibus bill amending criminal justice and law enforcement legislation. Julian Leeser, representing the Coalition, stated that while the party would not oppose the bill, significant concerns existed regarding the government's failure to progress broader electronic surveillance reforms. Leeser argued that extending sunset clauses for cybercrime disruption powers without comprehensive reform was an admission of failure. He called for the bill to be referred to a Senate committee for proper scrutiny of specific provisions.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Leeser stated that the Coalition would not oppose the bill in the House but raised concerns about its content and omissions. Leeser supported the technical and procedural amendments in Schedules 1, 3, 4, and 5, as well as the mixed-weight drug threshold changes in Schedule 2. However, Leeser criticised the government for extending cybercrime disruption powers via a sunset clause until 4 September 2029 without delivering broader electronic surveillance reform. Leeser argued that this extension reflected a failure to act on recommendations from the Independent National Security Legislation Monitor. Leeser called for the bill to be referred to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee for inquiry.