Free TAFE Program

Ryan supported the motion but raised concerns about the apprenticeship pipeline, noting that many apprentices failed to complete their training due to low wages and employer reluctance. Ryan highlighted that first-year apprentices often earned less than the median rent, making it difficult to sustain themselves, and argued that the government needed to address administrative burdens and provide incentives for employers. Ryan emphasised that free enrolment was only valuable if it led to completion and secure employment.

Coker argued that free TAFE was about fairness and expanding opportunity for all Australians, regardless of their ability to pay. Coker highlighted the government's investment of over $1.6 billion to support at least 100,000 places annually from 2027, targeting priority sectors and disadvantaged groups. Coker contrasted this approach with the opposition's previous cuts to the TAFE system and argued that the program was delivering economic prosperity and workforce stability.

Cook praised the program for changing lives and building the workforce needed for housing and care sectors. Cook cited specific enrolment and completion figures for Queensland and highlighted the cost savings for students in accounting and nursing. Cook noted the increase in women entering apprenticeships and the benefits of the new national credit recognition framework, arguing that the program was essential for future economic growth.

Buchholz argued that the TAFE system was broken, citing a drop of over 100,000 apprentices and trainees since the previous government left office. Buchholz highlighted a low completion rate of 8.37 per cent in the construction sector, attributing this to regulatory burdens and insolvencies in the industry. Buchholz stated that while he supported TAFE, the current program was not delivering sustainable outcomes and required adjustment.

Roberts supported the motion, noting that free TAFE had expanded opportunity in Western Australia, particularly in health, housing, and community services. Roberts highlighted the demographic reach of the program, including high participation from women, First Nations Australians, and people with disability. Roberts argued that legislating the program as permanent ensured long-term support for the national training system.

Fernando argued that free TAFE was fundamental to fairness and social mobility, removing financial barriers to education. Fernando highlighted the government's investment of over $1.6 billion through to 2034-35 and noted the high demand for the program. Fernando contrasted Labor's support for public education with the opposition's vote against making the program permanent.

Gregg supported the motion, emphasising the importance of reskilling in an economy transitioning due to artificial intelligence and other changes. Gregg highlighted the high completion rates in Victoria and the demand for courses in literacy, nursing, and training and assessment. Gregg argued that the program enabled people to gain skills without financial burden, benefiting both individuals and industry.

Mascarenhas highlighted the impact of free TAFE in Western Australia, citing over 100,000 enrolments and 34,000 completions. Mascarenhas discussed specific investments in facilities, such as the Bentley Pines Training Restaurant, and shared stories of students gaining qualifications in disability support and hospitality. Mascarenhas argued that the program lowered barriers for students and provided businesses with the skilled workers they needed.

Campbell visited the Acacia Ridge TAFE and highlighted the training of mechanics, plumbers, and carpenters for future technologies and housing needs. Campbell argued that free TAFE removed barriers and created pathways to secure work, contrasting Labor's investment with the opposition's lack of support. Campbell noted that enrolments had exceeded targets in the first year, demonstrating strong demand for the program.

Burnell highlighted the delivery of free TAFE in South Australia, citing enrolment and completion figures. Burnell argued that the program targeted priority sectors such as aged care, disability services, and digital skills, providing practical support for workforce development. Burnell emphasised that making the program permanent gave certainty to students and industries, and that VET graduates saw significant income increases after completing their qualifications.