Question Time AU

General Debate

Defence Procurement: Submarines

House of Representatives · Monday 23 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Members debated a motion acknowledging the government's $3.9 billion investment in the Osborne submarine construction yard and associated workforce training for the AUKUS partnership. Labor members highlighted the economic benefits, job creation, and sovereign capability gains, while Coalition members credited the previous government with initiating the partnership and questioned the current administration's broader national security strategy. Speakers generally agreed on the importance of the project for national defence and regional stability, with some noting the historical context of the agreement's formation.

Outcome

The motion was debated but no final result was stated in the provided transcript.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Clutterham moved the motion to recognise the first $3.9 billion put into the Osborne submarine construction yard, which supports the creation of approximately 4,000 construction jobs and 5,500 peak production jobs. Clutterham argued that the investment strengthens Australia's sovereign defence capability and supply chain while providing long-term economic opportunities for small and medium businesses. Clutterham emphasised the government's commitment to training a skilled workforce through a $480 million investment in the Skills and Training Academy Campus at Osborne. Clutterham stated that the project aligns with the 2024 National Defence Strategy and ensures Australia can deter conflict and protect maritime supply chains.