Question Time AU

Matter of Public Importance

Fuel Security

House of Representatives · Wednesday 11 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on concerns regarding fuel distribution, rising prices, and potential shortages affecting farmers and businesses. Opposition members argued that the government was failing to manage supply chains and was ignoring the impact on regional communities and primary producers. Government members countered that Australia was fuel secure, with adequate reserves and ongoing imports, attributing issues to demand spikes rather than supply failures. They highlighted regulatory actions to prevent price gouging and long-term strategies to reduce energy costs through competition reform and renewable energy adoption.

Outcome

No vote was taken as this was a Matter of Public Importance.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Tehan criticised the Minister for Climate Change and Energy for poor management of fuel distribution and rising costs. Tehan argued that the minister was distracted by international roles and failing to address constituent concerns about diesel shortages. Tehan claimed that fuel price increases of up to 40 per cent were exacerbating the cost-of-living crisis and threatening food security by hindering farming operations. Tehan asserted that the government's economic mismanagement was leading to higher mortgage repayments and supermarket prices.

Government response

Leigh stated that Australia was not experiencing a fuel shortage but rather localised disruptions due to demand spikes. Leigh highlighted that fuel reserves were at their highest level in 15 years and that ships were arriving regularly. Leigh announced that penalties for anticompetitive conduct would be doubled to $100 million and that the ACCC would ramp up fuel price monitoring. Leigh argued that the government's competition reforms and support for electric vehicles were reducing pressure on fuel supplies and improving consumer protection.

Opposition response

McIntosh argued that fuel price spikes and supply uncertainty were severely impacting small businesses and tradies in Western Sydney. McIntosh cited examples of transport operators facing rationing and increased operating costs, which were being passed on to consumers. McIntosh claimed that the government's failure to ensure stable fuel supply was crushing business margins and threatening jobs. McIntosh asserted that the government's leadership was missing and that the situation was causing unnecessary hardship for families and businesses.