Question Time AU

General Debate

Small Business

House of Representatives · Monday 2 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on the economic pressures facing small businesses, with the opposition arguing that high inflation, rising energy costs, and regulatory burdens were causing widespread distress. Government members countered that their administration had implemented significant support measures, including tax cuts, asset write-offs, and energy efficiency grants, while attributing economic challenges to pre-existing conditions. The discussion also touched on industrial relations reforms, infrastructure needs in regional areas, and the broader fiscal management of the economy. Speakers from both sides presented conflicting views on the effectiveness of current policies and the reliability of government support.

Outcome

The motion was debated as part of private members' business.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Venning argued that small businesses were under siege due to high domestic inflation, rising government debt, and surging electricity prices. Venning cited specific examples from South Australia, including extreme wholesale energy price fluctuations and the lack of support for farmers transitioning away from certain chemicals. Venning claimed that industrial relations changes and excessive regulation were stifling entrepreneurship and increasing compliance costs for regional businesses. Venning also highlighted infrastructure deficits, such as the lack of Doppler radar on the Eyre Peninsula, as evidence of government neglect.