Question Time AU

Matter of Public Importance

Cost of Living

House of Representatives · Thursday 12 February 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on the cost of living crisis, with opposition members arguing that government energy policies and spending have driven up prices for families and businesses. Government members countered that they are delivering significant relief through tax cuts, cheaper medicines, and expanded healthcare services, while blaming previous administrations for structural failures in the energy grid. The opposition criticised the failure to deliver promised energy bill reductions and warned of economic damage from rapid renewable energy transitions. Government speakers highlighted specific investments in Medicare urgent care clinics and mental health centres as evidence of their commitment to easing financial pressures.

Outcome

No vote was taken as this was a Matter of Public Importance.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Hogan argued that the cost of living is a crisis driven by government energy policies and rising mortgage rates, which he claimed are higher in Australia than in most other countries. Hogan criticised the government's net zero targets as an ideological obsession that imposes enormous costs on families and businesses, particularly through new transmission infrastructure and water buybacks in the Murray-Darling Basin. Hogan stated that the opposition supports emissions reductions aligned with the OECD average rather than the government's more aggressive targets. Hogan also highlighted the impact of the ute and SUV tax and increased regulatory burdens under the EPBC Act as factors increasing costs for consumers and exporters.

Government response

McBride argued that the government is actively delivering cost-of-living relief through measures such as bulk-billing incentives, cheaper medicines, and student debt relief. McBride highlighted the opening of Medicare urgent care clinics and mental health centres, citing specific usage figures in her electorate and nationally to demonstrate the value of these free services. McBride stated that the government has made the largest investment in Medicare since its creation, helping to reduce out-of-pocket costs for families. McBride contrasted this delivery with what she described as division and chaos within the opposition.

Opposition response

Webster argued that the government's net zero plan is failing to deliver on promises, noting that energy prices have risen significantly rather than falling as predicted. Webster criticised the home battery scheme as a taxpayer-funded measure that does not benefit renters or pensioners who cannot afford the upfront costs. Webster stated that the cost of net zero is being borne by taxpayers and is damaging regional economies, particularly farmers who are hosting large-scale renewable projects. Webster advocated for an energy policy that matches OECD averages rather than pursuing what she described as ideological aims.