Question Time AU

General Debate

Trust in Government

House of Representatives · Tuesday 10 February 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Allegra Spender addressed the erosion of public trust in Australian government institutions, citing survey data indicating low confidence in leaders and high levels of grievance. She outlined five key areas for reform: transparency, accountability, strengthening institutions, delivery of outcomes, and community engagement. Spender criticised the government for restricting freedom of information access and failing to respond to committee inquiries within mandated timeframes. She advocated for radical transparency, including the release of ministerial diaries and lobbyist sponsorship details, and suggested mechanisms like citizens' assemblies to improve democratic engagement.

Outcome

The debate concluded with no further speakers or formal vote recorded in the transcript.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Spender argued that public trust in government is critically low, with only one in three Australians believing leaders act correctly and 64 per cent worrying about deliberate misinformation. Spender identified five pillars for rebuilding trust: transparency, accountability, institutional strength, delivery, and community involvement. Regarding transparency, she highlighted that fully disclosed freedom of information requests dropped from 59 per cent in 2011 to 21 per cent in 2023 and 2024, while refusals doubled. Spender called for radical transparency, including publishing ministerial diaries and lobbyist sponsorships, to counter perceptions of undue influence. On accountability, she noted the government had failed to respond to 55 committee inquiry reports within the required six-month period. Spender also criticised recent electoral law changes that made it harder for independents and minor parties to succeed, arguing this reduced parliamentary competition. Spender advocated for restoring the frank and fearless advice role of the public service and improving the speed of the Administrative Review Tribunal, where only 42 per cent of cases are resolved within 12 months. Finally, she proposed using citizens' assemblies and digital tools to engage everyday people in policy reviews, rather than relying solely on vested interests.