Question Time AU

General Debate

Economy

House of Representatives · Monday 9 February 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate addressed rising inflation and interest rates, with members calling for stronger fiscal discipline and productivity reforms. Allegra Spender moved a motion urging the government to rein in spending, reinstate fiscal rules, and utilise technology for better service delivery. Claire Clutterham defended the government's economic management, highlighting cost-of-living relief measures and budget savings. Kate Chaney supported the call for reform, arguing that interest rate hikes disproportionately affect vulnerable households and that structural changes to taxation and regulation are needed to boost productivity.

Outcome

The motion was debated but the transcript does not state the final voting result.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Spender argued that government spending had grown too rapidly, reaching 26.9 per cent of GDP, and called for the reinstatement of fiscal rules and the Charter of Budget Honesty. Spender criticised the lack of strong business cases for some infrastructure projects and urged the government to adopt a lowest-cost approach to climate policies, such as reviewing the electric vehicle fringe benefits tax. Spender highlighted the slow adoption of artificial intelligence in public services and called for more ambitious industrial relations reform to balance worker benefits with productivity costs. Spender emphasised that regulatory burdens on businesses needed to be reduced through concrete measures rather than just goodwill.