Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Communications Legislation Amendment (Australian Content Requirement for Subscription Video On Demand (Streaming) Services) Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Thursday 6 November 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned the introduction of mandatory Australian content requirements for subscription video-on-demand services. Tony Burke moved the second reading, outlining the bill's aim to ensure streaming platforms invest in local stories. He detailed the consultation process and the specific mechanisms for compliance, including expenditure thresholds and reporting obligations. The debate was adjourned without further speeches recorded in the transcript.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Burke argued that the bill fulfils a commitment made in the National Cultural Policy to guarantee access to Australian stories on streaming platforms. Burke stated that without intervention, the availability of international content risks overshadowing local productions. The legislation amends the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 to impose content requirements on services with at least one million Australian subscribers. Burke emphasised that the measure supports the screen production sector and reflects Australia's cultural identity.

Government response

Burke stated that streaming platforms are required to spend a minimum of 10 per cent of their overall program costs in Australia on qualifying content, including drama, children's, and documentary shows. He added that international licensing fees count towards this spending total to stop services from dodging duties by cutting local investment. An optional path permits compliance via 7.12 per cent of Australian income. The Australian Communications and Media Authority will oversee adherence for three years, with a legal review planned four years after the rules start.