Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Protecting Voters) Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 3 November 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate focused on amending the Commonwealth Electoral Act to prohibit political parties and candidates from collecting and processing postal vote applications. Speakers argued that current practices allow parties to harvest personal data from voters under the guise of facilitating postal voting, a practice exempt from Privacy Act protections. The bill aims to ensure applications are sent directly to the Australian Electoral Commission to protect voter privacy and restore trust in the electoral system. Both speakers supported the measure as a necessary integrity reform.

Outcome

The motion for the second reading was moved and seconded, with no further debate or vote recorded in the provided transcript.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Chaney argued that the bill addresses a significant loophole allowing political parties to harvest personal data from voters through postal vote application forms. Chaney noted that since 2004, postal voting has tripled, yet parties can distribute unsolicited forms with reply-paid envelopes directing responses to private processing centres rather than the Australian Electoral Commission. Chaney highlighted that political entities are exempt from the Privacy Act, enabling them to store, use, or sell voter data without consent or oversight. Chaney cited warnings from the Australian Electoral Commission regarding privacy concerns and eligibility confusion caused by third-party distribution. The proposed amendment would require voters to submit applications directly to the Commission, thereby protecting personal information and restoring transparency.