Australian Centre for Disease Control Bill 2025, Australian Centre for Disease Control (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025; Second Reading

Continued the debate

Husic argued that the bill fulfilled a long-standing commitment to establish a coordinating body for public health threats, building on lessons from the pandemic. Husic criticised the previous government's management of COVID-19, citing inadequate vaccine procurement, the docking of the Ruby Princess, and partisan attacks on state lockdowns. Husic highlighted disparities in support for Western Sydney, noting a lack of vaccination and mental health hubs in hard-hit areas despite significant fines being issued. Husic contended that the CDC would ensure better coordination and equitable support for vulnerable communities in future crises.

Government response

Butler stated the bill delivers on the government's promise to create an independent statutory agency commencing on 1 January 2026. Butler referenced the independent COVID-19 Response Inquiry, which identified gaps in national readiness, fragmented data, and the need for a central authority. Butler explained that the CDC would provide transparent advice, publish its recommendations, and utilise advanced data analytics while maintaining privacy safeguards. Butler noted the agency would be led by a director-general accountable to parliament and supported by an advisory council including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander representatives.