Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Treasury Laws Amendment (Payments System Modernisation) Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Tuesday 2 September 2025

Continued from Wednesday 30 July 2025.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned modernising the Payment Systems (Regulation) Act 1998 to include digital wallets, buy-now-pay-later services, and blockchain technologies under Reserve Bank of Australia oversight. Coalition members supported the bill's objectives but moved an amendment requiring parliamentary disallowance powers for decisions by the RBA and the Treasurer, arguing that expanded regulatory reach necessitated greater democratic accountability. Government members defended the bill as essential for consumer protection, financial stability, and national security, rejecting the amendment to preserve regulatory independence. The amendment was defeated, and the bill was not passed on the division.

Outcome

The second reading amendment was not carried, and the bill was not passed on the division.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

Conaghan moved a second reading amendment calling for parliamentary disallowance powers over Reserve Bank and Treasurer decisions under the bill. Conaghan argued that while the Coalition supported modernising the outdated 1998 legislation to cover fintech and digital payments, the expansion of regulatory scope required basic parliamentary safeguards. Conaghan contended that the Reserve Bank's narrow mandate might not adequately consider broader economic impacts on competition and innovation, particularly for small fintech start-ups competing with incumbents. Conaghan stated that disallowance would provide transparency and accountability without hindering swift action on national security or consumer protection issues.

Government response

Mulino stated that the government would not support the amendment moved by Conaghan. Mulino argued that the bill's updated definitions for payment systems and participants were necessary to allow the Reserve Bank to effectively regulate new platforms and ensure the system remained safe and trusted. Mulino highlighted that ministerial designation powers would enable the Treasurer to address risks of national significance, such as cybersecurity or data sovereignty concerns. Mulino emphasised that these changes fulfilled the government's strategic plan for a modern, efficient, and competitive payments ecosystem.

Votes during this debate

Division 1: Treasury Laws Amendment (Payments System Modernisation) Bill 2025; Second Reading Not passed 50–91