Question Time AU

Matter of Public Importance

Regional Australia

House of Representatives · Thursday 27 March 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on whether the Labor government had neglected regional Australia or delivered significant improvements in infrastructure, health, and cost-of-living support. Opposition members argued that the government had cut essential grant programs, reduced water allocations for agriculture, and removed incentives for doctors to work in rural areas. Government members countered that they were reversing a decade of cuts, delivering record funding for roads, health clinics, and disaster management, and providing cost-of-living relief. The discussion highlighted specific projects in various electorates and disagreements over energy policy and public service job cuts.

Outcome

The matter of public importance was debated without a vote being taken.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Hogan argued that the government had neglected regional Australia, which generates the majority of export wealth, by cutting infrastructure programs such as the Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program and the Building Better Regions Fund. Hogan claimed that changes to distribution priority areas caused doctors to leave rural communities for outer suburbs, worsening healthcare shortages. Hogan also criticised the ban on live sheep exports, reductions in water allocations for agriculture, and the government's renewable energy policies, which he said threatened regional jobs and food security.

Government response

McBain stated that the government was delivering record funding to rebuild services left in crisis by the previous administration, including $66 million for Roads to Recovery and $7.2 billion for Bruce Highway upgrades. McBain highlighted the establishment of the National Emergency Management Agency and the Disaster Ready Fund to support regional communities during natural disasters. McBain also noted investments in regional aviation, including support for Rex Airlines, and criticised the opposition for planning to cut 41,000 public service jobs, many of which are located in regional areas.

Opposition response

McCormack supported the retention of Rex Airlines but criticised a Labor petition for collecting personal data for political purposes. McCormack argued that the removal of distribution priority areas had reduced the number of doctors in rural areas and praised the Murray-Darling rural medical network for training doctors who stay in regional communities. McCormack also pointed to the government's lack of transparency regarding water buybacks in the Murray-Darling Basin and urged voters to support the Coalition to restore regional services.