Question Time AU

Matter of Public Importance

Albanese Government

House of Representatives · Thursday 13 February 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on the government's record on the cost of living, national security, and economic management. Opposition members argued that the government had failed to control inflation, protect national cohesion, or deliver on infrastructure promises, while government members defended their record on reducing inflation, increasing wages, and investing in health and housing. The opposition highlighted concerns over energy policy, antisemitism, and housing costs, whereas the government emphasised its cost-of-living relief measures and contrasted them with the opposition's history of cuts. The debate concluded without a vote, as is standard for Matters of Public Importance.

Outcome

The debate concluded without a vote, as is customary for Matters of Public Importance.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Dutton argued that the government was out of touch with households struggling with rising costs, including insurance, rent, and groceries. Dutton claimed the Prime Minister had failed to keep Australians safe, citing a decline in social cohesion and safety for the Jewish community following the events of 7 October 2023. Dutton criticised the government's environmental policies, particularly the Nature Positive Bill, as detrimental to mining and the economy in Western Australia. Dutton also highlighted the closure of the Tasmanian salmon farming industry and a record number of small business and doctor surgery closures. Dutton outlined the Coalition's plan to cut government waste, rebalance migration, fix the housing crisis, and restore bulk-billing rates.

Government response

Gorman criticised the Leader of the Opposition's leadership, citing past comments from former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull about Dutton's lack of courage and conviction. Gorman highlighted the Coalition's past failures, including the Robodebt scheme, opposition to net zero legislation, and cuts to Medicare and childcare. Gorman argued that the Coalition's plans would result in significant cuts to public services, including 1,700 public servants in Western Australia. Gorman defended the government's record on tax cuts, energy bill relief, cheaper medicines, and fee-free TAFE, stating that Australians would be worse off under the opposition.

Opposition response

Littleproud argued that the government's ideology, particularly regarding energy policy, had driven up inflation and interest rates, reducing the standard of living by eight per cent. Littleproud claimed that the shift away from reliable energy sources had increased electricity bills and grocery prices. Littleproud criticised the government for not standing up to supermarkets and energy companies. Littleproud outlined the Coalition's plan to pause seven-star construction codes, ban foreigners from competing in housing auctions, and introduce nuclear energy to stabilise the grid.