Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Appropriation Bill (No. 3) 2024-2025, Appropriation Bill (No. 4) 2024-2025, Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 2) 2024-2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Tuesday 11 February 2025

Continued from Tuesday 4 February 2025.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Opposition members supported the appropriation bills to ensure government services continued but used the debate to criticise the government's economic management and energy policy. Luke Howarth argued that high inflation, rising energy costs, and business closures resulted from government spending and reliance on renewable energy. Anne Webster focused on the negative impact of renewable infrastructure on regional agriculture and advocated for nuclear energy as a cheaper alternative. Jenny Ware echoed concerns about cost-of-living pressures before her speech was cut short. No amendments were moved, and the outcome of the vote is not stated in the provided transcript.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

Howarth stated that the coalition supported the bills to maintain essential services but criticised the government for economic mismanagement that had increased the cost of living. Howarth argued that additional spending had fuelled inflation and that energy bills had gone up by an average of $1,000 for each household, contrary to earlier promises. Howarth claimed that productivity had fallen and that living standards would not recover until 2030. Howarth also argued that policies influenced by the Greens, such as taxing wealth, would ultimately increase costs for consumers and small businesses.