Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 2) 2024-2025

Stage by Stage

Summaries in reported speech - not a transcript. In date order, both chambers.

1. Tuesday 4 February 2025 · House of Representatives

   Second Reading

   The House considered a bill to provide additional funding for parliamentary departments for the remainder of the 2024-25 financial year. The legislation specifically allocated funds for the Department of the House of Representatives to support a national youth parliament program. The member moving the motion highlighted the educational value of the program for students. The debate was brief and concluded with the adjournment of discussion.

   Outcome: The debate was adjourned.

   Read the full summary

2. Tuesday 11 February 2025 · House of Representatives

   Second Reading

   Opposition members supported the appropriation bills to ensure government services continued but used the debate to criticise the government's economic management and energy policy. Luke Howarth argued that high inflation, rising energy costs, and business closures resulted from government spending and reliance on renewable energy. Anne Webster focused on the negative impact of renewable infrastructure on regional agriculture and advocated for nuclear energy as a cheaper alternative. Jenny Ware echoed concerns about cost-of-living pressures before her speech was cut short. No amendments were moved, and the outcome of the vote is not stated in the provided transcript.

   Read the full summary

3. Wednesday 12 February 2025 · Senate

   First Reading
   See who spoke

4. Wednesday 12 February 2025 · Senate

   Second Reading

   The Senate debated the second reading of three appropriation bills for the 2024-2025 financial year. Senator Malcolm Roberts moved a series of amendments on behalf of Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party. These amendments sought to significantly reduce funding allocations, specifically targeting the Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water portfolio. The proposed changes included reducing a specific clause amount from over five billion dollars to approximately one point four billion dollars. The Senate rejected all nine amendments moved by the senator.

   Outcome: The question on the amendments was negatived.

   Read the full summary