Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Whistleblower Protection Authority Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 10 February 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Independent members Andrew Wilkie and Helen Haines introduced and seconded the Whistleblower Protection Authority Bill 2025 to establish an independent statutory authority for supporting whistleblowers. They argued that current laws are ineffective, citing cases where whistleblowers faced prosecution despite exposing serious misconduct. The speakers urged the government to fulfill its pre-election promises regarding whistleblower reforms. The debate was adjourned without a vote on the bill.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Wilkie moved the second reading of the bill, arguing that three years had passed without meaningful government reform to protect whistleblowers. Wilkie contended that the National Anti-Corruption Commission would be undermined without effective protections that give people confidence to raise allegations. Wilkie cited several historical examples, including Toni Hoffman and Richard Boyle, to demonstrate that current laws fail to protect those who expose wrongdoing, with some facing prison sentences. Wilkie proposed the establishment of an independent authority with a commissioner and advisory board to provide support, investigate mistreatment, and enforce protections. Wilkie stated the bill was drafted with expert consultation and called for cross-party collaboration to pass it.