Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

National Land Transport Act Amendment (Better Value for Taxpayers) Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 10 February 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate focused on introducing stricter accountability measures for large infrastructure projects to ensure better value for taxpayers. Independent members argued that current practices lack transparency, with significant cost blowouts and insufficient scrutiny of business cases. The bill proposes mandatory long-term strategies, public business cases, reporting on cost changes, and post-completion reviews. Both speakers supported the legislation, citing the need to curb political spending and address inflationary pressures in the construction sector.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Spender moved the second reading, arguing that the bill addresses a lack of value for money in government infrastructure spending. Spender highlighted that building costs had risen by 30 per cent since the pandemic, contributing to $32 billion in cost pressures within a $120 billion pipeline. Spender stated that the bill would mandate a 10-year land transport strategy, require public disclosure of business cases, and enforce parliamentary reporting on material cost changes. Spender also noted that the Halton review identified 80 projects that should not proceed, yet the government had not disclosed which ones were cancelled. Spender challenged both major parties to support the measures, which she described as basic business discipline.