Question Time AU

Take Note Debate

Artificial Intelligence

Senate · Tuesday 15 September 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senator Pocock moved a take note debate regarding the government's response to questions about AI consultation. He argued that the government was contradicting its stated commitment to strong protections for artists and media. Pocock claimed that new proposals would shift the burden of protection onto creators rather than AI companies. He sought to table documents supporting his claims but was denied leave. The debate concluded with the suspension of standing orders to allow the tabling of the document.

Outcome

Leave to table screenshots was not granted, but standing orders were suspended to allow the document to be tabled.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Pocock argued that the government was consulting on options that significantly weakened existing copyright protections for creatives. Pocock stated that current laws automatically protect content, placing the onus on AI companies to seek permission and pay for use. Pocock claimed the government intended to flip this onus by introducing a statutory data-training authorisation model. This model would grant AI companies statutory permission to access internet material for training unless creators actively opted out. Pocock argued this approach prioritised AI companies over everyday Australians and undermined the rights of content owners.