Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Criminal Code Amendment (Equal Access to Voluntary Assisted Dying) Bill 2026; Second Reading

Senate · Thursday 13 August 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senator Sarah Hanson-Young introduced legislation to amend the Criminal Code to permit the use of telehealth for voluntary assisted dying consultations. She argued that current laws disproportionately disadvantage patients in rural and remote areas or those with limited mobility, creating inequity in access to end-of-life care. The senator emphasised that the bill does not alter state-based safeguards but removes a federal barrier to medical practice. The debate was adjourned after the senator sought leave to continue her remarks later.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned after the senator sought leave to continue remarks later.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

The senator argued that the bill addresses health inequity by allowing doctors to use telehealth for voluntary assisted dying assessments. Hanson-Young stated that existing Criminal Code provisions, designed to prevent online suicide encouragement, inadvertently criminalise legitimate medical consultations via phone or video. Hanson-Young contended that this creates a two-tier system where rural residents and those with declining mobility are denied access to care available to city dwellers. The senator clarified that the proposal respects state jurisdiction over voluntary assisted dying safeguards and does not alter those protections. Hanson-Young urged colleagues to support the amendment to ensure all Australians receive dignified end-of-life care regardless of location.