Question Time AU

General Debate

KPMG Australia

Senate · Thursday 25 June 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Senate debated a motion regarding KPMG Australia's misuse of confidential client information and the subsequent resignations of senior executives. Senators from the Greens, Liberal Party, and Labor Party agreed that systemic reforms were urgently needed to address regulatory gaps in the auditing sector. Key proposals included breaking up the Big Four firms, strengthening whistleblower protections, and extending the Corporations Act to cover large partnerships. The debate concluded with the Senate adjourning before a vote was taken.

Outcome

The debate was interrupted and the Senate adjourned at 17:30.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Senator Pocock moved the motion, pointing to confirmed claims from whistleblowers that KPMG partners had improperly used private client information to win audit contracts. Pocock argued that KPMG had failed basic ethical tests and was unfit for government work, referencing the firm's $2.3 billion revenue and history of cover-ups. Pocock called for the breakup and regulation of the Big Four firms, penalties for unethical contractors, and enhanced whistleblower protections. Pocock emphasized that self-regulation had failed and that the government must implement recommendations from previous parliamentary inquiries to reform the auditing and consulting sectors.