Question Time AU

Take Note Debate

Taxation

Senate · Monday 30 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senator Pocock moved that the Senate take note of answers regarding the housing crisis, arguing that Labor policies exacerbated the situation by prioritising wealthy investors. She criticised the five per cent deposit scheme and the Housing Australia Future Fund as ineffective and too slow. The senator called for the removal of capital gains tax discounts and negative gearing to fund public housing. She also linked rising costs to corporate profiteering and international conflict. The motion was agreed to without further debate.

Outcome

The motion was agreed to.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Pocock argued that the housing crisis was worsened by Labor's decision to allocate $53 billion for tax benefits for affluent property investors over four years. Pocock claimed this approach prioritised multiple-property owners over renters and mortgage holders, with projections indicating a further $190 billion in wasted revenue over the next decade if reforms were delayed. The senator contended that the five per cent deposit scheme increased demand and made auctions more difficult for first-home buyers, while the Housing Australia Future Fund was too small, slow, and complicated. Pocock advocated for abolishing the capital gains tax discount and negative gearing to redirect funds toward building public and affordable housing. Pocock described these tax breaks as drivers of intergenerational inequality and called for progressive tax reform in the upcoming budget.