Question Time AU

Take Note Debate

Answers to Questions

Senate · Thursday 26 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senators debated the government's handling of a national fuel crisis driven by global supply chain disruptions. Opposition members argued that the government lacked a coherent logistics plan, failed to guarantee fuel availability, and was blaming external factors for domestic shortages. Government senators defended their actions, citing measures to support the transport industry and protect against price gouging, while attributing the vulnerability of the supply chain to previous coalition policies that reduced domestic refining capacity. The debate concluded with the motion being agreed to.

Outcome

Question agreed to.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Cadell argued that the government was failing to manage the logistics of fuel distribution, focusing instead on tactical responses to global events. Cadell highlighted reports of service stations running out of fuel in regional areas and claimed that major suppliers were using market dominance to restrict access for smaller wholesalers. Cadell noted that the government could not guarantee that fuel rationing would not occur or that supplies would remain stable. Cadell criticised the reliance on the ACCC to address price issues, arguing that the agency lacked the power to investigate global oil pricing or local price gouging effectively. Cadell also referenced a National Emergency Management Agency simulation, suggesting the government's preparedness was inadequate given the current breakdown in the fuel system.