Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Migration Amendment (2026 Measures No. 1) Bill 2026; Second Reading

Senate · Wednesday 11 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Senate debated the Migration Amendment (2026 Measures No. 1) Bill 2026, which sought to grant the government power to temporarily restrict travel for certain temporary visa holders during international crises. Assistant Minister Anthony Chisholm argued the legislation was necessary to protect the integrity of the migration system and respond rapidly to global shocks, such as conflicts in the Middle East. He outlined that the bill included safeguards, including time limits, parliamentary tabling requirements, and exemptions for family members and humanitarian visa holders. The debate was adjourned without a final vote recorded in the provided transcript.

Outcome

The resumption of the debate was postponed to a later hour.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Chisholm supported the bill, arguing it enabled the government to respond efficiently to rapid international developments that could strain the migration system. Chisholm stated that without this legislative change, the government would be forced to individually assess visa cancellations, which is inefficient during crises. The bill would allow the Minister for Home Affairs, with agreement from the Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs, to make arrival control determinations for temporary visa classes. Chisholm emphasised that the power was limited to temporary visas, could last up to six months, and required parliamentary tabling with reasons. Chisholm noted exemptions for parents of children in Australia, immediate family members of citizens or permanent residents, and humanitarian visa holders.