Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Defence Amendment (Sexual Assault Prevention, Intervention and Response Commission) Bill 2025; Second Reading

Senate · Thursday 27 November 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senator David Pocock moved the second reading of the bill, which proposes establishing an independent statutory commission to address sexual assault within the Australian Defence Force. He argued that current systems fail victims by prioritising institutional protection over individual safety and that previous government efforts have been insufficient. The bill aims to provide prescriptive legal requirements for prevention, intervention, and response, including specific duties for leaders and protections for survivors. The debate was adjourned with leave granted for Senator Pocock and Senator Lambie to continue their remarks at a later stage.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned with leave granted for Senator Pocock and Senator Lambie to continue their remarks later.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Senator Pocock supported the bill, arguing it establishes an independent commission to centre victims and survivors rather than protecting the institution. Pocock cited numerous complaints from defence members who felt abandoned, discouraged from reporting, or subjected to retaliation and stigma. Pocock contended that sexual assault in defence is a systemic cultural issue that previous reviews, including the Royal Commission into Defence and Veterans' Suicide, have identified as entrenched. The proposed legislation would create clear duties for leaders, ensure accountability, and mandate that those who commit or cover up assaults have no place in the force. Pocock emphasised the urgency of the reform, stating that delays deny justice and support to those affected.