Question Time AU

General Debate

Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts; Order for the Production of Documents

Senate · Tuesday 25 November 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senator Payman moved a motion requiring the Minister representing the Minister for Communications to explain the failure to comply with an order for documents related to social media ban legislation. The motion cited a public interest immunity claim and the lack of further information provided since November 2025. Senator Walsh stated the government would oppose the motion, noting that documents had been provided and a briefing offered. The motion was defeated in a division with 26 votes against and 30 votes in favour.

Outcome

The motion was not passed, with the division result being 26 votes against and 30 votes in favour.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Payman moved a motion stating that the Minister representing the Minister for Communications had not met the requirements of order for the production of documents no. 37, which was agreed to on 28 July 2025. The motion noted that the minister had indicated no further information was available concerning a public interest immunity claim and had not supplied extra details since appearing in the Senate on 5 November 2025. Payman asked that the minister appear in the Senate on 26 November 2025 to give a five-minute account of the non-compliance. The motion also suggested that any senator could move to note the explanation, with debates capped at 20 minutes and speeches limited to five minutes each.

Government response

Walsh sought leave to make a short statement on behalf of the government. Walsh stated that the government would oppose the motion. Walsh noted that the government had already provided documents to Senator Payman. Walsh also mentioned that a briefing had been offered, which was understood not to have been accepted.

Votes during this debate

Division 11: Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts; Order for the Production of Documents Not passed 26–30